U.S. Department of Energy - Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Fuel Cell Technologies Program

FY 2007 Financial Awards

In 2007, DOE awarded funding to a number of science and research projects to support research, development, and demonstration of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies.

DOE Awards $100 Million for Fuel Cell R&D

Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman announced $100 million to fund 25 projects to advance the development of fuel cell technology. View DOE's October 2006 press release.

Details on the individual projects awarded are provided below. The following documents are available as Adobe Acrobat PDFs. Download Adobe Reader.

Selected Organization Location Funding* Project Description
Topic Area 1: Improved Fuel Cell Membranes
Arkema King of Prussia, PA $6.3M (PDF 15 KB)
3M St. Paul, MN $8.9M (PDF 16 KB)
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA $6.0M (PDF 15 KB)
Topic Area 2: Water Transport within the Stack
Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester, NY $2.7M (PDF 15 KB)
CFD Research Corporation Huntsville, AL $4.7M (PDF 15 KB)
Nuvera Fuel Cells Cambridge, MA $5.0M (PDF 15 KB)
Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM $6.5M (PDF 15 KB)
Topic Area 3: Advanced Cathode Catalysts and Supports
3M St. Paul, MN $8.4M (PDF 15 KB)
UTC Power South Windsor, CT $6.4M (PDF 15 KB)
Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM $6.8M (PDF 16 KB)
Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, IL $5.4M (PDF 15 KB)
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, WA $4.6M (PDF 15 KB)
Topic Area 4: Cell Hardware
GrafTech International Ltd. Parma, OH $2.3M (PDF 16 KB)
UTC Power South Windsor, CT $2.0M (PDF 15 KB)
Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN $4.5M (PDF 15 KB)
Topic 5: Innovative Fuel Cell Concepts
Plug Power Latham, NY $1.0M (PDF 15 KB)
Case Western Reserve University Cleveland, OH $0.8M (PDF 16 KB)
Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, IL $1.0M (PDF 106 KB)
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, WA $1.0M (PDF 15 KB)
Topic Area 6: Effects of Impurities on Fuel Cell Performance and Durability
Clemson University Clemson, SC $2.0M (PDF 15 KB)
University of Connecticut - Connecticut Global Fuel Cell Center Storrs, CT $1.9M (PDF 15 KB)
Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM $3.6M (PDF 15 KB)
Topic Area 7: Stationary Fuel Cell Demonstration
Intelligent Energy Inc. Long Beach, CA $2.2M (PDF 16 KB)
Plug Power Latham, NY $3.6M (PDF 17 KB)
Plug Power Latham, NY $4.0M (PDF 15 KB)

*All award amounts are subject to Congressional appropriations and negotiation.

Back to Top

Hydrogen Lessons Learned

In 2007, the Fuel Cell Technologies (FCT) Program released a solicitation for hydrogen lessons learned and awarded the University of Missouri.

The Department of Energy (DOE) sought applications to conduct a study to identify the lessons learned from prior hydrogen-based stationary power programs, including the most significant obstacles, how these obstacles have been approached, outcomes of the programs, and how this information can be used in the DOE Hydrogen Program. DOE seeks to learn from the challenges of previous stationary power programs and use the lessons learned to develop a strategy that systematically incorporates both the stationary and the transportation sectors and defines the various trade-offs, synergies, and opportunities.

Back to Top

Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Analysis: Environmental Impacts of Hydrogen Systems

In 2007, the Fuel Cell Technologies (FCT) Program released a solicitation for hydrogen and fuel cell analysis on the environmental impacts of hydrogen systems. The program awarded the Tetra Tech and the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

The purpose of this project was to identify and examine possible near and long-term ecological and environmental effects of the production of hydrogen from various energy sources (based on the DOE hydrogen production strategy) and the use of that hydrogen as a transportation fuel and for stationary power. This project develops the precise systems-based engineering models of the likely hydrogen and criteria pollutant emissions and quantifies the potential impacts of the different market penetration scenarios.

Back to Top